Development of a device for the reintegration of people with incomplete quadriplegia
Ana Luisa Oliveira da Nóbrega Costa, Tiago Camargo Alves, Hugo Faria Frota, Abner Pereira Duarte Silva, Miguel Alves Pereira Júnior, Rafaela de Faria Dantas, Emerson Fachin Martins, Andrea Cristina dos Santos
The product development process (PDP) presents interactive stages to be followed for the release of a product. The study adapts the classic PDP approach to a Project-Based Learning context guide the application for the development of an assistive device that allows people with incomplete quadriplegia to practice paralympic tennis with higher performance and comfort. The study was based on research performed within a nonprofit social assistance Association dealing with disabled people. The research identified that the main barrier faced by players of paralympic tennis is the difficulty to hold, maintain, and transmit power through the racket during the game. Based on this demand, the early stages of PDP were applied in a university PBL and the development of the new solution achieved Technological Readiness Level (TRL) of 2. The final deliverables were CAD model and a conceptual prototype.
Akao, Y. (1990) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Cambridge, MA: Product Press.
Alden, C., & Aran, A. (2016). Foreign policy analysis: new approaches. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Back, N., Ogliari, A., Dias, A. & Silva, J. C. (2008) Projeto Integrado de Produtos: planejamento, concepção e modelagem. Barueri, SP: Manole.
Bardales, A. M. (2013). Modelo de estimativa de custos para as fases iniciais do projeto de produto mecatrônico [Master’s Thesis], Universidade de Brasília, Brasília.
Caldwell, M., & De Luigi, A. J. (2018). Wheelchair Dance Sport. In A. J. De Luigi. Adaptive sports medicine (pp. 171-179). Cham: Springer.
Carvalho, A. A. S. (2005). Miopatias. Revista Neurociências, 13, 35-38.
Clausing, D. (1994). Total quality development. New York: ASME Press.
Conforto, E. C., Amaral, D. C., & Silva, S. D. (2011). Roteiro para revisão bibliográfica sistemática: aplicação no desenvolvimento de produtos e gerenciamento de projetos. In 8º Congresso Brasileiro de Gestão de Desenvolvimento de Produto - CBGDP (pp. 1-12). Porto Alegre.
Dieter, G. E. (2000). Engineering design: materials and processing approach. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Franceschine, F., & Maisone, D. (2015). Prioritization of QFD customer requirements based law comparative judgments. Quality Engineering, 27, 437-449.
Harijith, R., & Naduthodi, H. (2017). Kano model customer satisfaction analysis of medical services. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 4(6), 1426-1429.
Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1997). Default and renegotiation: A dynamic model of debt. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 1-41.
Hauser, J. R., & Clausing, D. (1988). The House of Quality. Harvard Business Review, 66(3),63-73.
Hicks, B., Larsson, A., Culley, S., & Larsson, T. (2009). A methodology for evaluating technology readiness during product development. In 17th International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’09) Design has never been this cool, Stanford University, California, USA. Design Society.
International Tennis Federation – ITF. (2017). Quad Draw Player List, 2017. Retrieved in YEAR, MONTH DAY Consut. 2018-08-28, from https://www.itftennis.com/en/ Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality. Journal of Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14, 39-48.
Kwong, C. K., Chen, Y. Bai, H., & Chan, D. S. K. (2007). A methodology of determining aggregated importance of engineering characteristic in QFD. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 53, 667-679.
Liverani, A., Caligiana, G., Frizziero, L., Francia, D., Donnici, G., & Dhaimini, K. (2019). Design For Six Sigma (DFSS) for additive manufacturing applied to an innovative multifunctional. International Journal of Interative Design and Manufacturing, 13, 309-330.
Madzik, P., Lisa, L., & Budaj, J. (2019). Determining the importance of customer requirements in QFD – a new approach based on Kano Model its comparation with other methods. Quality-Acess To Success., 20, 3-15.
Mankins, J. C. (1995). Technology Readiness Levels. A White Paper. April 6. Washington, DC, USA: Advanced Concepts Office, Office of Space Access and Technology, NASA. Retrieved in YEAR, MONTH DAY Consut. 2018- 11-06, from http://www.artemisinnovation.com/images/TRL_White_Paper_2004-Edited.pdf
Mansor, M. R., Sapuan, S. M., Zainudin, E. S., Nuraini, A. A., & Hambalic, A. (2014). Conceptual design of kenaf fiber polymer composite automotive parking brake lever using integrated TRIZ–Morphological Chart–Analytic Hierarchy Process method. Materials & Design, 54, 473-482.
Monteiro, S. et al. (2017). A Project-based Learning curricular approach in a Production Engineering Program. Production, 27, 1-12.
Otto, K., & Wood, K. (2001) Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. New York, Prentice Hall, 2001.
Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., & Grote, K. H. (2007). Engineering Design: A systematic approach (3rd ed.). London: Springer-Verlag.
Rozenfeld, H., Forcellini, F. A., Amaral, D. C., Toledo, J. C., Silva, S. L., Alliprandini, D. H. & Scalice, R. K. (2006). Gestão do desenvolvimento de produtos: Uma referência para a melhoria do processo. São Paulo: Saraiva.
Salerno, M. S., Gomes, L. A. V., Silva, D. O., Bagno, R. B., Freitas, S. L. T. U. (2015). Innovation processes: which process for which project? Technovation, 35, 59-70.
Sharif Ullah, A. M. M., & Tamaki, J. I. (2011). Analysis of Kano‐model‐based customer needs for product development. Systems Engineering, 14, 154-172.
Shaw, J. (1995). A schema approach to the formal literature review in engineering theses. System, 23(3), 325-335.
Shekar, A. (2007). Active learning and reflection in product development engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 32(2), 125-133.
Stark, J. (2015). Product lifecycle management. In Product lifecycle management (Vol. 1, pp. 1-29). Cham: Springer.
Straub, J. (2015). In search of technology readiness level (TRL) 10. Aerospace Science and Technology, 46, 312-320.
Ullmann, D. G. (1997). The mechanical Design Process (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ulrich, K. T., & Eppinger, S. D. (2004). Product design and development. New York: McGraw-Hill.
United States Professional Tennis Association – USPTA. (2018). Do You Want To Be a Player. Lake Nona, Florida.: Tennis Equipment Tips.
Wood, D. F. (2003). Problem based learning. BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.), 326, 328-330.
Yang, K., & Basen, S. E. H. (2008). Design for six sigma: A road map for product development. New York: McGraw Hill.
Zancul, E. D. S., Sousa-Zomer, T. T., & Cauchick-Miguel, P. A. (2017). Project-based learning approach: Improvements of an undergraduate course in new product development. Production, 27, 1-14.
Zhang, Y., Ren, S., Liu, Y., Sakao, T., & Huisingh, D. (2017). A framework for Big Data driven product lifecycle management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 159, 229-240.